One
of the perplexing problems of Protestantism is the lack of authority. Pray tell
me which of these 33,000 separate denominations and/or independent churches[i]
has that God given authority. How can anyone in their right mind claim that the
Holy Spirit in these instances has lead them into all truth (John 16:13)? To
make such a claim is preposterous foolishness. Yet, scripture unequivocally
declares that the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the
truth. (1 Timothy 3:15 NIV).”
The Calvinist, primarily Reformed and Baptists churches have
their lopsided theology that rules under the tyranny of eternal security championed
under the hubris of “Once Saved, Always Saved.” Lutheran and Anglicans and such
have theirs. Almost all—if not, indeed, all, the evangelical and
fundamentalists communions more or less cherry-picked their theology, but
by-in-large, that includes agreement on sola fide, sola gratia, and sola
scriptura. Left out, of course is the key to authority—that is, the Church (1
Timothy 3:15). The question, therefore, is: Should we add sola ecclesia to the mix? If not, then, why not? Scripture declares
that it is “the pillar and foundation of truth.” How dare we declare otherwise?
Give the average Evangelical, however, a multiple choice question with “Which
of the following is the pillar and foundation of truth?” and chances are if
given a choice between the Scripture or the Church I guarantee you that the
most likely answer will be Scripture. Why? Because we all see through rose
colored glasses which have been tinted since childhood or from conversion to
see what we want to see. Me included; although, I am trying to break the habit.
Let us, however, at this point back track and ask ourselves
if we have not boxed in the process we call sanctification and eventually, of
course, salvation by restricting it to a single act of faith?
So, may I asked you how many people have been “saved by
faith alone?” I would dare venture to say that none has. That is not to say,
however, that faith is not one of the ingredients necessary in salvation, but
it is not the sole ingredient. In short, faith of the intellectual sort may
acknowledge Christ as Lord and Savior but fail to follow through with a
personal commitment. Intellectual consent is far different than committed
obedient faith. However, faith, even committed faith alone will not save us,
unless it is faith of the proper order. The Watch Tower Society and The Mormon
Church are faith communities, but where their teaching authority, and on what
basis?
Hebrews 11:1 clearly declares that faith has substance (ὑπόστασις/hypostasis)
which is something that we can place our hope in; in other words, there is
structure and content to this faith—that is to say, Biblical faith has a
distinctive essence. Not just any old faith will do. There are many false
Christs and we must be careful not to buy into one of their twisted versions of
the Gospel. "For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and
shall show great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they
shall deceive the very elect (Matthew 24:24)."
I know that Paul says in Ephesians 2:8—
For it is by grace you have been
saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—
(NIV)
Being saved through faith is different, however, than being
saved by faith. What Paul is saying here is that salvific grace will only
operate in and through the substance of faith. Not just any faith; however, will
do. We must “contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all handed down
to the saints (Jude 1:3 NASV).”
Thus we can readily see that in a real sense faith is both a
verb and a noun—a verb because it is active (we must contend); and a noun
because it is of substance with content (which was once for all handed down to
the saints). The parameters of faith are, therefore, clearly circumscribed.
Now, think with me for a moment. Which is the greatest:
mustard seed faith or great faith? Shall I surprise you by saying, “Neither”?
Here is how blogger Jeremy D. Myers put it—
“Faith is the conviction that
something is true. Jesus spoke of little faith and great faith, but He never
spoke of more faith or less faith. Faith does not come in percentages or
degrees. We are not made with faith containers in our souls which overflow when
our faith is great, and which are nearly empty when our faith is little. Faith
does not work like that.”[ii]
So, in
essence, God does the saving, we do the obeying.
This
either/or mentality that Protestants seem to obsess with is unscriptural to say
the least, as it fails to take in “the whole counsel of God (Acts 20:27).” Now,
I ask you, would it not be best, therefore, to approach theology with an open
mind willing to concede that both/and may be scriptural and necessary? After
all, we seek the full counsel of God. In line with this, one of my favorite
questions to ask my sola fide friends is “How does one receive salvation,
justification, the new birth, and eternal life? Is it —
- By believing in Christ (John 3:16; Acts 16:31)?
- By repentance (Acts 2:38; 2 Peter 3:9)?
- By baptism (John 3:5; 1 Peter 3:21; Titus 3:5)?
- By the work of the Spirit (John 3:5; 2 Corinthians 3:6)?
- By declaring with our mouths (Luke 12:8; Romans 10:9)?
- By coming to a knowledge of the truth (1 Timothy 2:4; Hebrews 10:26)?
- By works (Romans 2:6, 7; James 2:24)?
- By grace (Acts 15:11; Ephesians 2:8)?
- By His blood (Romans 5:9; Hebrews 9:22)?
- By His righteousness (Romans 5:17; 2 Peter 1:1)?
- By His Cross (Ephesians 2:16; Colossians 2:14)?"
Of course
the answer is “all 11 of the above.” There is no short cut to salvation—it is
obedience all the way. God does His part, but we must do ours also. To try and
short circuit the process by adroit manipulation of some of these key
principles, as if they exclusively stand on their own is simply not Biblical.
Now, I am
fully aware that faith that produces charitable works in compliant with sincere
obedience to the whole counsel of God (Acts
20:27) is the essential ingredient; however, being fully persuaded (without
rehashing the old Calvinism/Arminian debate) that the reason Calvinist so
ardently fight charitable works as not just proof of their salvation but also a
necessary sanctifying process is that by so doing they would have to give up
the pet doctrine of “Once Saved, Always Saved (i.e., Unconditional Election).” The
reason being, of course, that if anything (in their mind) can contribute to or short
circuit the salvic process, then ipso
facto it must be dismissed as out of hand—anything, meaning, of course, not
abiding in the branch (John 15:6); making shipwreck of their faith (1 Timothy
1:19); apostasy (Hebrews 6:4-8; 2 Peter 2:20-22); straying after Satan (1
Timothy 5:15); falling from grace (Galatians 5:1-26); lukewarmness (Revelation
3:16); becoming a castaway (1 Corinthians 9:26-27); and many, many more.
Talk about rose colored glasses! This is, of
course, in direct contradiction to much of scripture, and is once again an
illustration of the either/or approach to doctrinal issues. Simply put: Why
warn someone of the dire effects of apostasy, if indeed apostasy is impossible?
Yet, this is precisely what they would have you and I believe. Why? Because theologically eternal security
is out the window if we by the sheer strength of God’s working in us we freely
cooperate in any sense of the word we have committed the horrible sin of works.
So, as far as these men are concerned it is the sheer force of God’s determined
will that overrides any reluctance we may possess as a product of a selfish
free will, and so in essence we really have no choice.
However, after considering all of these dire
warnings, and more, [iii] as I
have said, I want to pay particular attention to a quote by Charles A. Hodges a
noted predestinarian theologian) which he made in regards to 1 Corinthians
9:26-27 which in my Bible reads reads—
“Therefore I
do not run like someone running aimlessly; I do not fight like a boxer beating
the air. No, I strike a blow to my body and make it my slave so that after I
have preached to others, I myself will not be disqualified for the prize.”
Here is what Dr. Hodges had to say—
“It belongs
(meaning all these verses and others of like nature) therefore to the same
category as those numerous passages which make the same assumption with regard
to the elect. [That] by God’s telling the elect that if they apostatize they
shall perish, prevents their apostasy. And in like manner, the Bible teaching that
those for whom Christ died shall perish if they violate their conscience,
prevents their transgression, or brings them to repentance, God’s purposes
embrace the means as well as the end. If the means fail, the end will fail. He
secures the end by securing the means, it is just as certain that those for
whom Christ died shall be saved, as that the elect shall be saved. Yet, it both
cases the event is spoken of as conditional. There is not only a possibility, but an
absolute certainty of the perishing if they fall away. This passage, therefore,
is perfectly consistent with those numerous passages which teach Christ death
secures the salvation of all those who were given to him in the covenant of
redemption.”[iv]
Did you get that? In essence Dr. Hodges is
calling God a deceiver? God tricks Christians into believing that they just
might apostatize, but really He is just kidding because actually it is just a
trick to scare them out of really apostatizing. The question is, however, why
would I or God or anyone else warn someone of a danger when in fact a danger
does not exist? To do so is a boldfaced lie. What else can we call it?
Again, this illustrates the length that these
predestinarians will go to maintain this damnable heresy. Strong language I
realize; however, no stronger than that of scripture. A false security is in
fact no security at all. Yes, God will accomplish His purposes in us, but not
without our cooperation—which in itself suggest freedom to choose otherwise.
Again, why suggest freedom if indeed no freedom exists? Preposterous, to say
the least.
Now, do I lie awake at night thinking I might
not make it to Heaven? Absolutely not. You want to know why? The answer is that
I have put my full confidence in God’s ability to keep me safe. Which is
precisely what I have done; and I don’t have any intention on changing my mind,
either.
[i] World Christian Encyclopedia by Barrett, Kurian,
Johnson (Oxford University Press, 2nd edition, 2001).
[ii] http://www.faithalone.org/magazine/y2008/faith.html
[iii] 1 Corinthians 9:27
(ESV)— But I discipline my body and keep it under control, lest after
preaching to others I myself should be disqualified.
·
Matthew 18:15-18 (ESV)— “If your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault,
between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother.
But if he does not listen, take one or two others along with you, that every
charge may be established by the evidence of two or three witnesses. If he
refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church. And if he refuses to listen
even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. Truly,
I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever
you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
·
2 Timothy 1:15 (ESV)— You are aware that all who are in Asia turned away from me,
among whom are Phygelus and Hermogenes.
·
Hebrews 10:26-29 (ESV)— For if we go on sinning
deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer
remains a sacrifice for sins, but a fearful expectation of judgment, and a fury
of fire that will consume the adversaries. Anyone who has set aside the law of
Moses dies without mercy on the evidence of two or three witnesses. How much
worse punishment, do you think, will be deserved by the one who has spurned the
Son of God, and has profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was
sanctified, and has outraged the Spirit of grace?
·
1 Timothy 4:1-3 (ESV)— Now the Spirit
expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting
themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, through the
insincerity of liars whose consciences are seared, who forbid marriage and
require abstinence from foods that God created to be received with thanksgiving
by those who believe and know the truth.
[iv]
Hodges, Charles, A Commentary on 1 & 2 Corinthians, (Edinburgh: Banner of
Truth, © 1978) pg. 149
[v] I use the words “ecclesial community” in the same
sense as I would use the word fellowship or ekklesia.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We appreciate your comments and opinions, please continue.